{"id":134,"date":"2020-10-08T14:58:34","date_gmt":"2020-10-08T14:58:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/millercanfield.pl\/?p=134"},"modified":"2025-04-14T18:03:35","modified_gmt":"2025-04-14T18:03:35","slug":"legalisation-of-unauthorised-construction-after-19-september-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/millercanfield.pl\/en\/legalisation-of-unauthorised-construction-after-19-september-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"LEGALIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION AFTER 19 SEPTEMBER 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Amendment to Construction Law<\/h2>

19 September 2020 marked the coming into force of the Act of 13 February 2020 Amending the Construction Law and Some Other Acts (henceforth the Amendment; Journal of Laws 2020, item 471). It introduced a number of changes aimed at cutting red tape around construction projects and giving investors greater legal protection.
One area in which significant changes have been made is legalization of construction projects started or conducted in violation of the law. A separate new chapter, 5a, has been added to the Construction Law\u2019s text, titled \u201cProceeding regarding construction projects started or conducted in violation of the law.\u201d As the government, which authored the Amendment, says in its explanatory memorandum [1], this will help tidy up regulation of the matter and make specific provisions easier to find.<\/p>

New procedure for legalising unauthorised construction<\/h2>

Under provisions in effect since 19 September, where a structure has been built or is being built: 1) without a requisite building permit or 2) without a requisite notice of construction, or despite an objection having been raised to the notice of construction,
the construction supervision authority orders construction to be halted. The authority may institute safeguard measures as part of the suspension notice, as deemed necessary and appropriate. For example, it may order that the structure or the construction site be secured, or it may order the abatement of a danger. In the suspension order, the authority also informs the investor that they can apply to have the structure legalized, and that there is a legalization fee (and how this fee is calculated).<\/p>

The investor has within 30 days of receipt of the suspension order to apply for legalization. If the investor fails to submit such an application, or withdraws it, the authority issues a demolition order. If the investor applies for legalization, the authority initiates the legalization procedure. It begins by ordering the investor to submit requisite legalization documentation, giving the investor at least 60 days to do so. In the case of structures built without a building permit, the legalization documentation is the documentation
required when applying for a building permit, plus two additional documents, namely: (i) a technical design that takes account of the construction work completed; and (ii) a statement from the mayor or president that the project is consistent with the local
zoning plan or a zoning decision. In the case of structures built without a notice of construction, a site plan has to be enclosed.
If legalization documentation is not submitted within the time limit provided, the authority issues a demolition order (Article 49e (3)).<\/p>

If legalization documentation is submitted within the time limit provided, the authority checks it for completeness, and reviews the site plan for compliance with Construction Law provisions, including the technical-construction provisions. For structures already built, compliance with provisions in force at the time of their completion is determined. If the authority finds no irregularities in the legalization documentation submitted (or if irregularities identified by the authority have been rectified by the investor), the authority orders the investor to pay the legalization fee.<\/p>

It is only when the fee has been paid that legalization is effected. The authority issues a legalization decision, in which it approves the construction design or site plan, and allows construction work to resume (where applicable). Importantly, legalization does
not release the investor from the obligation to obtain an occupancy permit. And in case of failure to pay the legalization fee, the authority issues a demolition order (Article 49e (5)). The authority may also opt to carry out an environmental impact assessment before issuing a legalization decision, in cases where making such an assessment is both required (under the Act of 3 October 2008 on Access to Information on the Environment and its Protection, Public Participation in Environmental Protection, and the Environmental Impact Assessment) and feasible, meaning that it is possible to consider alternative solutions and to establish environmental protection conditions for the project.<\/p>

Simplified legalization procedure<\/h2>

The Amendment also introduced a separate, simplified legalization procedure for old unauthorized structures, completed at least 20 years earlier. As the explanatory memorandum notes, it applies mainly to structures built before the current Construction
Law came into force (1995). It is expected that the simplified procedure will encourage owners to legalize them, which will clarify their legal status and help improve their safety (e.g. by subjecting them to compulsory, periodic inspections). In the simplified procedure, the construction supervision authority orders the owner to submit legalization documentation, giving them at least 60 days to do so. The main required documents include: a declaration of legal title to use the property for construction purposes; an as-built geodetic inventory; and an opinion by a licensed construction expert stating that the technical condition of the structure (i) does not pose a hazard to human life or health; and (ii) that it can be safely used for the current or intended purpose.<\/p>

Importantly, there is no legalization fee. The authority\u2019s role is limited to checking whether the condition is met that no proceeding had been initiated regarding the structure, and checking the submitted legalization documentation for completeness.
Compliance with the local zoning plan is not determined. As the explanatory memorandum points out, since the local government has accepted the structure\u2019s existence for 20 years \u2013 it would have become aware of its existence when drawing up
or updating the local zoning plan \u2013 questioning its compliance only now, after all these years, would not be justified. In the simplified legalization procedure, the construction supervision authority issues a legalization decision in case (i) the submitted legalization documentation is complete (or gaps identified by the authority have been rectified); and (ii) the opinion by a licensed construction expert concludes that the technical condition of the structure does not pose a hazard to human life or health, and that it can be safely used for the current or intended purpose. Conversely, it issues a demolition order in case (i) legalization documentation has not been submitted within the time limit provided; (ii) gaps identified by the authority in the submitted legalization documentation have not been rectified within the time limit provided; or (iii) if the opinion by a licensed
construction expert concludes that the technical condition of the structure poses a hazard to human life or health, or that it cannot be safely used for the current or intended purpose. Unlike in the standard legalization procedure, here the legalization decision serves as the legal basis for occupancy.<\/p>

[1] Source: https:\/\/www.sejm.gov.pl\/Sejm9.nsf\/druk.xsp?nr=121, access: 5 October 2020<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\tJacek Choroma\u0144ski, attorney at law, law office of Miller Canfield
Originally published in PMR Construction Insight: Poland, No. 10 (235), October 2020<\/span>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t